Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lammi

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1982PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The defendant was charged with violating c. 14, § 14-29, of the Fitchburg General Ordinances, making it a criminal offense either to drink any alcoholic beverage or to possess “an opened container full or partially full of any alcoholic beverages, while on, in, or upon any public way, upon any way to which the public has right of access, in any place in which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees.” 1

There is no factual dispute. The defendant admits to having an exposed half-pint bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey in his hip pocket on Columbus Street in Fitchburg. Although the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. SeesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Zayre Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. City of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Blixt v. BlixtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Decker v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Neff v. Commissioner of the Department of Industrial AccidentsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. James J. Welch & Co. v. Deputy Commissioner of Capital Planning & OperationsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API