Legal Opinion
Charlemagne v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 29, 2001No. AC 21055PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The third party plaintiff, Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company (Progressive), appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the third party defendant, USAA Casualty Insurance Company (USAA). Progressive claims on appeal that the trial court improperly concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to the residency of Dana Bitgood and improperly denied its oral motion for a continuance and written motion to reargue. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The underlying action resulted from a March 3, 1998 motor vehicle accident in which the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Doty v. Shawmut BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Bishel v. Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of America, FSB v. HanlonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Luthy v. the Eagle Leasing Co., No. Cv 97-0403340s (Aug. 7, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001