Woodward v. Heichelbech
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
On exceptions to a master's report in a suit to annul a marriage.
The petition is not based on any of the causes enumerated in the statute, but seeks to invoke the original jurisdiction of the chancellor to annul an unconsummated marriage on the ground of fraud. The parties went through a ceremony of marriage on May 20th, 1922, before a civil officer in the State of New York authorized to perform the same. At that time the petitioner was a woman twenty-two years of age. No children resulted from the marriage, and the master reports that he is convinced that the ceremony was never consummated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rinaldi v. RinaldiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
- Bolmer v. EdsallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Steerman v. SnowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
- Ysern v. HorterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
- Dooley v. DooleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Keller v. LinsenmyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Hallford v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Rhoades v. RhoadesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Rhoades v. RhoadesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.