Hastings v. Pichinson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Plaintiffs, John J. Pichinson and others, sued for and obtained a declaratory judgment that they own the gas under two leases. The question is whether the two leases have terminated as to gas, and if so whether they were revived. The jury answered all issues for the plaintiffs. We hold that' plaintiffs, as a matter of law, own one lease, but lost the other.
The first lease was executed on February 9, 1958, by G. B. Hastings and wife, and was for oil and gas under 188.74 acres of Frio County land. At the time of trial there was a gas well on that tract. We shall call it the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Greene v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Watson v. RochmillTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. ReidTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Grissom v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brown v. HaightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Burks v. LeapSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- In Re NeuscheMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Westbrook v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.