Legal Opinion
Swezey v. Home Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 14, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-200PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Elizabeth and Robert J. Swezey, guardians of Daniel Swezey, have brought this action against the Home Indemnity Company (“Home”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, seeking a judgment declaring that their son Daniel Swezey is entitled to recover “basic loss benefits” covering his sizable and continuing expenses for medical care and rehabilitation under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 40 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 1009.101 et seq. (the “Pennsylvania Act” j. 1 Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loretta Dixon Fallat, Guardian of the Estate of Cyril Dixon, a Weak-Minded Person v. John A. GouranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Toter v. KnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Zagari v. GralkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- DeVincentis v. Maryland Casualty CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- Knappenberger v. BittnerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elizabeth Swezey and Robert J. Swezey, Guardians of Daniel Swezey v. The Home Indemnity Company. Appeal of Elizabeth Swezey and Robert J. SwezeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Swezey v. Home Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Hunt v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Travelers Insurance v. Abel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1983