Legal Opinion

Wood Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1950No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

This proceeding for the appointment of a guardian of the estate of Jennie Howell Dean, an alleged weak-minded person, was brought under the Act of May 28, 1907, P. L. 292, as amended, 50 PS §941, et seq. Edwina Howell Wood, her granddaughter, was the petitioner. She and her six-year-old daughter are Mrs. Dean’s only lineal descendants. The hearing judge concluded that the subject of this proceeding was able to take care of her property and was not liable to become the victim of designing persons within the intent of the Act, and accordingly dismissed the petition. On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ray v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Sturgeon WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Carter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Denner v. BeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. McCormick Transportation Co. v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Golleher v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Nagy AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. In re the Estate of PetersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  5. Sigel AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API