Legal Opinion

Saslaw v. Rosenfeld

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1959No. 2268PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Suit was brought against appellant by one Keyser for the balance due on a promissory note. Appellant answered denying the indebtedness and brought appellee into the case as a third-party defendant- alleging;, that as his attornev. aooellee. had with. out consent permitted ICeyser to apply payments made on the note to an open account which appellant denied owing.

Appellee moved for summary judgment on the ground that the third-party action was barred by a release. Through affidavits and documents submitted in support of his motion, appellee established that pri- or to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nahtel Corporation v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. White v. LuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Bolling Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Lillie v. Rexrode v. William E. Vinson, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Marvin Rexrode, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. Derzavis v. Security Storage Co. of Wash.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Bolling Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API