Legal Opinion

Tinman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 20, 2001No. 00-72327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONCERNING Defendant’s Motions to Maintain documents under seal (Docket # S 40 & 55) and Protective Order For Plaintiff’s Counsel

PEPE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court are Defendant Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan’s (“BCBSM”) motions to maintain documents under seal. This matter has been referred to this Court for hearing and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motions are denied.

1. Background

On April 4, 2001, the district court issued a protective order providing, inter alia, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. The Procter & Gamble Company v. Bankers Trust Company, Bt Securities Corporation, the McGraw Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Deford v. Schmid Products Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
  4. Waelde v. MerckDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  5. Nicklasch v. JLG Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Healey v. I-Flow, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. Bauer v. Mohegan Council of EldersMohegan Trial Court · 2009
  3. Maas v. JTM Provisions Company Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  4. Michella Smith, et al. v. Brian S. Berger, et al.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. WALSH v. DONER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, INC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API