Tinman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONCERNING Defendant’s Motions to Maintain documents under seal (Docket # S 40 & 55) and Protective Order For Plaintiff’s Counsel
PEPE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan’s (“BCBSM”) motions to maintain documents under seal. This matter has been referred to this Court for hearing and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motions are denied.
1. Background
On April 4, 2001, the district court issued a protective order providing, inter alia, that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- The Procter & Gamble Company v. Bankers Trust Company, Bt Securities Corporation, the McGraw Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Deford v. Schmid Products Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Waelde v. MerckDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Nicklasch v. JLG Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Healey v. I-Flow, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Bauer v. Mohegan Council of EldersMohegan Trial Court · 2009
- Maas v. JTM Provisions Company Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Michella Smith, et al. v. Brian S. Berger, et al.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
- WALSH v. DONER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, INC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020