Legal Opinion

Nicklasch v. JLG Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided December 20, 1999No. IP 98-1090-C-D/FPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY AND ORDER

on discovery of incident reports submitted for in camera inspection, and JLG’s Objections to Production and Motion for Protective Order (doc. no. 103).

FOSTER, United States Magistrate Judge.

The plaintiffs’ and JLG’s briefs have been submitted pursuant to my Order of December 2,1999 (doc. no. 101) regarding the seven incident reports of prior failures submitted for in camera inspection. JLG objects to production of the reports on the grounds that they are irrelevant and that portions of the reports are protected by the work product qualified privilege.

JLG argues that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. Harper v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
  3. Stout v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
  4. Stout v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
  5. Epperly v. Lehmann Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Massey Coal Services, Inc. v. Victaulic Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2008
  2. Tinman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API