Legal Opinion

Healey v. I-Flow, LLC

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 3, 2012No. Civ. No. 09-3541 (JRT/JJK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JEFFREY J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant I-Flow, LLC’s (“I-Flow”) request to keep sealed and redact portions of certain exhibits previously filed under seal in connection with Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend his Complaint to Assert a Claim for Punitive Damages. (Doc. Nos. 81, 85.) Based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part 1-Flow’s request.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant 1-Flow’s request to keep sealed or redact portions of certain exhibits previously…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. In Re: Cendant Corp., (Formerly Known as Cuc International, Inc.) Cendant Capital I Lester A. Goldstein, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Welch & Forbes Inc., an Institutional Investment Manager, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Walter A. Forbes Cosmo Corigliano Anne M. Pember Merrill Lynch & Co. Chase Securities Inc. Henry R. Silverman v. Ernst & Young Cendant Membership Services, Inc. Casper Sabatino Steven P. Speaks Kevin T. Kearney Mary Sattler Howard SirotaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Cowley v. PulsiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willis Electric Co., Ltd. v. Polygroup LimitedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API