First Title & Securities Co. of Bloomington v. United States Gypsum Co., of Chicago
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Faville, J.'
I. A portion of appellee’s argument is directed to the question of the jurisdiction of this court to entertain the appeal in this cause, upon the record made. Appellee contends that the appeal is, in effect, merely an appeal from a ruling on a motion to strike, and that such an intermediate order is not appeal-able.
There are two sufficient answers to this contention of the appellee’s: (1) The question is not raised in this court by motion or written objections, as required by Section 12886, Code, 1927; and (2) it affirmatively appears that the appeal is from a final judgment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Nelson v. Consol. Independent Sch. Dist. of Troy MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Quinn v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Franke v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Federal Chemical Co. v. PaddockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Spellacy v. American Life Ins. Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Burns v. FlemingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Joslin v. Continental & Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.