Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1936No. 29611PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

In a proceeding instituted by the attorney general of this state, in the district court for Douglas county, under our banking act, having for its purpose the winding up of the affairs of the State Bank of Omaha, an insolvent institution, George S. Van Schaick, superintendent of insurance of the state of New York, filed a petition of intervention challenging the claim of E. H. Luikart, receiver of the Verdigre State Bank of Verdigre, Ne*224braska, to certain dividends claimed by him arising out of the State Bank of Omaha, and due to the National Surety Company of New York. The prayer of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Webster v. HitchcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. First Title & Securities Co. of Bloomington v. United States Gypsum Co., of ChicagoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Artman v. West Point Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Scofield v. State National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Aspinwall v. AspinwallNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barry v. WolfNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Anson v. KruseNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Matter of Estate of VoglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Greenamyre v. LandesNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Benes v. MatulkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API