Legal Opinion

Joslin v. Continental & Commercial National Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 27, 1931No. 40778PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graee, J.

The answer in a single division pleaded matters which both parties construe to be an attempt to set up payment and estoppel. Plaintiff moved to strike portions of this answer. After the filing of motion to strike Niles & Watters Savings Bank amended setting up largely in different form the same matters.- Plaintiff moved to strike from this amendment and also to strike the amendment as a whole. The first motion was largely sustained. No ruling was made upon the second. The record does not show that defendant either stood upon its answer or suffered judgment. Ordinarily an appeal will not lie…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Carroll ClinicSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. First Title & Securities Co. of Bloomington v. United States Gypsum Co., of ChicagoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Hawthorne v. AndrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Barber v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. In Re Estate of DelaneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dorman v. Credit Reference & Reporting Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Ferguson v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ontjes v. McNiderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Crowell v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Jeffords v. StocktonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API