Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Smith

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided July 2, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-A-715-EPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

The question before this three-judge federal court, empaneled pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2284, is whether claims brought by a group of voters who are challenging a state legislative districting plan are barred by an earlier final judg-‘ ment in a state lawsuit in which two other voters challenged the same plan. For the reasons that follow, we hold, on motions for summary judgment, that this federal lawsuit is barred in part only.

I. SUMMARY-JUDGMENT STANDARD

The summary-judgment standard applicable here almost needs no repeating. Rule 56(c) of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Wisconsin Elections BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kelley v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  3. Gustafson v. JohnsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. Brown v. Certain Underwriters Mendes & MountDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019
  5. Kelley v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API