Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Johns

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided May 22, 2006No. CIV.A. 05-00352-CGCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This action is the latest chapter in a long history of legal challenges to Alabama’s 2001 legislative redistricting. Plaintiffs, nineteen Aabama voters, challenge the redistricting plans, Acts 2001-727 and 2001-729, on several grounds. They assert that the plans (1) violate the constitutional guarantee of one-person-one-vote; (2) constitute illegal partisan gerrymandering; and (3) violate Plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to freedom of association. The issue before this Court 1 is whether this action is barred by earlier challenges to the redistricting plans. We hold that this action is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Tyus v. SchoemehlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013
  2. Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
  3. weston v. winooskiVermont Superior Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API