Gustafson v. Johns
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This action is the latest chapter in a long history of legal challenges to Alabama’s 2001 legislative redistricting. Plaintiffs, nineteen Aabama voters, challenge the redistricting plans, Acts 2001-727 and 2001-729, on several grounds. They assert that the plans (1) violate the constitutional guarantee of one-person-one-vote; (2) constitute illegal partisan gerrymandering; and (3) violate Plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to freedom of association. The issue before this Court 1 is whether this action is barred by earlier challenges to the redistricting plans. We hold that this action is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Tyus v. SchoemehlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013
- Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
- weston v. winooskiVermont Superior Court · 2023