Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Moore

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1908PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from tbe District Court of Sixth Judicial District for Lemhi County. Hon. J. M. Stevens, Judge. Action to recover upon a written contract for the sale of a horse. Judgment for plaintiff. Counsel cite no authorities on points decided.

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

The respondent, as assignee of Dunham & Fletcher, brings this action to recover the sum of $309 alleged to be due upon the following contract:

“No. 2015 (32464) . Baker, Ida., 3-12, 1906.
“Name of Stallion, Brise Tout.
“Dunham and Fletcher, of Wayne, Ill., agree to sell the above named stallion for $3400 to the undersigned subscrib*466ers, who wishing to improve their stock, agree to pay to-Dunham, Fletcher $309 for each share in said stallion.
“Capital stock, $3400. No. Shares. 11.
“Payment to be made in cash; or one-third in one year,, one-third in two years, and one-third in three years from July…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Huston v. HuntIdaho Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Wooddy v. JamiesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Casady v. ScottIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hollon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Havlick v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Armstrong v. HendersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API