Legal Opinion

Portlock v. Perry

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 24, 1993No. 05-91-01695-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

Raymond Portlock and Mary Portlock, individually and as heirs to the estate of Erica Portlock, deceased, (the Portlocks) appeal the summary judgment rendered in favor of Kenneth W. Perry in this negligence and medical malpractice cause of action. In two points of error, the Portlocks argue that the trial court erred in granting Perry summary judgment and in denying their motion for rehearing. Because the trial court properly granted Perry summary judgment and properly denied the Portlocks’ motion for rehearing, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Leyendecker & Associates, Inc. v. WechterTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. McClure v. Allied Stores of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Cotten v. Weatherford Bancshares, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Pabich v. KellarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Cass v. Stephens, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  4. Kingston v. Helm, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API