Legal Opinion

Lakin v. Stine

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 8, 1999No. 96-75828PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF AND REJECTING THE MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.

TARNOW, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Petitioner, David Patrick Lakin 1 filed an application for writ of habeas corpus pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Mr. Lakin, prior to trial, requested new counsel several times, because counsel would not meet with him privately. He told the judge that if the court would not appoint him new counsel he would be forced to represent himself. The judge refused to appoint new counsel. Mr. Lakin was compelled to proceed without counsel. The waiver of counsel…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lakin v. StineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Morse v. TrippettDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  3. Mitchell v. MasonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API