Legal Opinion

Hatcher v. Farber

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 23, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — James W. Willett, Judge. This was an action in probate for the allowance of a claim in favor of the estate of Mary L. Bradford, deceased, and against the estate of C. J. Hoyt, deceased. The amount claimed was $4,000 and interest, and that amount was allowed. The case was tried to the court, without a jury. The administrator appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The claim was based upon the following allegations, substantially: That C. J. Hoyt, during his lifetime, purchased for Mary L. Bradford certain real estate; that said Mary L. Bradford furnished the money to make said purchase, and C. J. Hoyt took the title in his own name; that subsequently said C. J. Hoyt sold or traded said real estate for $4,000.

It is undisputed that the rights of third parties have intervened so as to prevent an enforcement of the trust in the specific property. A money allowance and order of payment and establishing the claim against the estate was therefore had.

*1252No…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Acker v. PriestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. State v. MaddenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Reynolds v. SumnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Romp v. MahinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Parker v. CatronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crouch v. National Livestock Remedy Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Lende v. FergusonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Floy v. HibbardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. In Re Estate of Michael FiliSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. State v. HelgersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API