Cuttle v. Concordia Mutual Fire Ins.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
In June, 1933, plaintiff took out fire insurance in defendant Concordia Mutual Fire Insurance Company on their farm buildings and there by became members of the company, with rights subject to its charter and by-laws then or thereafter in force. Under the then charter and by-laws plaintiffs were entitled to service of notice of assessments upon them personally, or by the leaving of the same at their place of residence with some person of suitable age and discretion. In October, 1934, at a called meeting of the members of the company, the charter was amended to conform with the provisions of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Cuttle v. Concordia Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Ieronimo v. HagermanArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Cuttle v. Concordia Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.