Tinker v. McLaughlin-farrar Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Osage County Court; C. T. Bennett, Judge. Action between George E. Tinker and others and the Mc-Eaughlin-Farrar Company. From the judgment, Tinker and others bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
Defendant in error has filed a motion herein to dismiss this proceeding, because the judgment against the plaintiffs in error in the court below has been settled and released. In support of its motion, it has filed a certified copy of the journal entry in the court below, showing, first, an assignment of the judgment; and, second, that the same has been satis fied and released. The motion to dismiss has been served upon plaintiffs in error, who have made no response thereto.
It follows that the proceeding should be dismissed, because it presents only abstract or hypothetical questions for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reece v. ChaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Pyeatt v. EstusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Grand River Dam Authority v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Lucas v. First Nat. Bank of PawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hart v. Jett Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.