Legal Opinion

Reece v. Chaney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1911No. 181PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Payne County; A. H. Iluston, Judge. Action by J. W. Eeecei administrator, against George W. Chaney and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

It appears from a motion filed herein and the answer thereto, that, since the institution of this proceeding in error, all the matters in controversy involved in this action have been settled between the parties, except the costs of this proceeding, and a decision upon the questions of law raised in this proceeding could not afford any relief to the parties hereto, except to determine who shall pay the cost. It is a well-settled rule in this court that it will not decide abstract or hypothetical questions from which no practical relief will follow. Hodges et al. v. Schafer, 23 Okla. 404, 100…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Albright v. EricksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Hodges v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Grand River Dam Authority v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Tinker v. McLaughlin-farrar Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Bush v. Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n of Las VegasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Hampton v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API