Charlie Rhodes v. United States

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

Having been convicted on five counts of violating provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relating to alcoholic liquors, appellant contends his conviction should be reversed because certain evidence admitted was obtained by an unlawful search and seizure, because the court admitted certain statements of appellant without first requiring the Government to prove that they were voluntary, and because of defects in the indictment, the proof, and the instructions to the jury.

The indictment charged appellant Rhodes and a codefendant, James Miller, with (1) possession of 51Í6…