Legal Opinion

United States v. Santos Charles, Jr. And Steven McAninch

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 13, 1984No. 83-2550PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

In this case the United States appeals an order of the district court granting the motion of defendants-appellees to suppress certain post-offense, preindictment oral and written statements. The district court found that the defendants made the statements while they were in custody and that the government failed to meet its burden of proving that the statements were made pursuant to a voluntary waiver of defendants’ rights after the defendants received proper warnings in accordance with Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. United States v. BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Geronimo Muniz-MelchorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API