Legal Opinion

State v. Emile

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 23, 1915No. 20858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; John R. Land, Judge. A. Emile and another were convicted of unlawfully keeping a blind tiger, in violation of a police jury ordinance of Caddo parish, and defendant Emile appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

The accused, A. Emile, has appealed from a conviction and sentence upon an information before the district court of the parish of Caddo, charging that he and Miller Joseph — • ■

“being then and there the proprietors of a certain building located 800 block of Louisiana street, Shreveport, Caddo parish, Louisiana, unlawfully did keep_ a blind tiger and maintain a public nuisance in said building, by then and there keeping for sale, barter, exchange, or giving áway a large quantity of whisky and beer, to wit, six cases of quart bottles of Old Forrester whisky, one trunk full of Old Forrester…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HagenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. City of Shreveport v. MarounSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  3. Parish of Concordia v. Natchez, Red River & Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  4. Sterling v. Parish of West FelicianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
  5. Farmer v. MylesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LassiterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. Travis v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API