Legal Opinion

Hines Clark & Curtis Herring v. Cummings

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1892No. 7317PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTOH, Judge, Section B.

— February 16,1889, the appellee, A. H. Cummings, brought this suit in the District Court of Bexar County, against Joe Murray as principal, and Hines Clark and Curtis Herring as sureties, in a contract for the delivery of cattle. Plaintiff sought to recover damages for the breach of the contract.

According to the terms of this contract, dated November 26, 1887, Joe Murray as principal, with appellants as sureties, bound himself, to sell and deliver to Cummings, the appellee, 300 head of steer cattle, one year old in June, 1887, at the price of $5.50 per head, to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ryan v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gardner v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lane & Saylor v. Scott & CulverTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Wylie v. HightowerTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United Concrete Pipe Corp. v. Spin-Line Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Page v. White Sewing Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Moore v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Wright v. A. G. McAdams Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Friedman-Shelby Shoe Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API