Legal Opinion

Lampus v. Crozier-Straub, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 18, 1930No. 4275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below the defendant was charged with infringement of patent No. 1,212,840, granted to Straub for a building block and making the same. The validity of that patent was adjudged by this court in Straub v. Campbell, 259 F. 570, and again in Crozier-Straub, Inc., v. Graham, 28 F.(2d) 321, and reference to the opinions in such cases obviates present restatement.

In the present ease the defendant sought to escape infringement in the manufacture of his blocks by adding slag to the ingredients of the Straub patent, but the proofs show that the slag added was of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crozier-Straub, Inc. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
  2. Straub v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson & Johnson v. Carolina Lee Knitting Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. A. S. Boyle Co. v. Siegel Hardware & Paint Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1938
  4. Johnson & Johnson v. Carolina Lee Knitting Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API