Legal Opinion
Ledgin v. Cross
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided May 8, 1996No. Civil Action Nos. 95-2531-GTV, 95-2551-GTVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court has before it Plaintiffs’ Motion To Compel Under Rule 37(a) (doc. 48). Since its filing the parties have orally agreed that the motion may be deemed withdrawn, except as to its paragraph 10. That paragraph asks that defendants be ordered to produce two documents identified in their disclosures pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. They consist of a Memorandum, dated September 2, 1993, and a chronological summary. Defendants resist discovery upon the grounds these two documents are work product. With the oral agreement of counsel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Janicker v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Sequoia Books, Inc. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Election Commission v. Christian CoalitionDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Lindley v. Life Investors InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
- RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Hatfield v. Cottages on 78th Community Association, TheDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Jet Air Inc v. Alliance Air Parts IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024