Legal Opinion

Ned Gill v. H. A. Phillips, Trustee of Tinney Produce Company, Inc., Bankrupt

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 15, 1964No. 20780PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEWIN, Circuit Judge.

This interlocutory appeal, which was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b), presents for our determination the difficult question whether, under the facts .and in the circumstances before us, the appellant Ned Gill impliedly consented to the summary jurisdiction of the Referee in Bankruptcy to cancel and set aside •certain allegedly fraudulent or preferential transfers made to Gill by the bankrupt, Tinney Produce Company, Inc. 1 Since we do not agree with the District Court that the findings of the referee .support a conclusion that Gill’s actions constituted a consent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. The Inter-State National Bank of Kansas City v. Frank Luther, Trustee, Matter of Garden Grain & Seed Company, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Florance v. KresgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Maule Industries, Inc. v. L. M. Gerstel, Trustee of Ludwig Corporation, Bankrupt, and Ludwig Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. Columbia Foundry Co. v. LochnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Beitel v. OCA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Mirant Corp. v. the Southern Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  4. In Re WarrenDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
  5. In Re Oxford Marketing, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API