Legal Opinion

American Nat. Bank of Okmulgee v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1932No. 21394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.

This is a proceeding in error brought to review the action of the district court of Oklahoma county refusing to allow the plaintiff in error, the American National Bank of Okmulgee, Okla., to share in the proceeds of two insurance policies on the life of Tom King, that were payable to his widow, Pearl T. King, and his minor children, Tom King, Jr., and Margaret King.

King, for a long time, had 'been in the banking business in Oklahoma. He was a bank examiner at one time. He had filled stations in the banks at Ada, Durant, and Okmulgee. He married the defendant in error Pearl T. King, in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Ross v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Succession of OnoratoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. Mullikin v. PedersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. G & M MOTOR CO. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Spiro State Bank v. BANKERS'NAT. LIFE INS. CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API