Legal Opinion
Ross v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 5, 1923No. 23,222PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Plaintiff and Charles H. Ross, now deceased, were husband and wife and resided with their 9 children on a farm near Beaver Creek, in Rock county. The defendant, Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company, issued two policies to the deceased, one for $5,000 on March 29,1918, and one for $6,000 on June 30,1920, in each of which the plaintiff was named as the sole beneficiary. The husband was insolvent at the time the two policies were issued, as well as at the time of his death, which occurred on July 15, 1921. This action was brought against the company to recover upon both policies. The company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Chapin v. FellowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Harvey v. HarrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Baron v. . BrummerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Johnson v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doethlaff v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Spiro State Bank v. BANKERS'NAT. LIFE INS. CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- American Nat. Bank of Okmulgee v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Borin v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Evans v. HeatonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.