Legal Opinion
Nauss v. Pinkes
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 17, 1984No. (2302) (2878)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
These two cases, which were tried separately, were combined on appeal 1 since both arise from the same factual matrix.
The underlying facts are undisputed. In the spring of 1971, David D. Nauss as trustee, the Old 79 Realty Co., Inc., and Brookside Realty, Inc., 2 sought a special exception permit from the planning and zoning commission of the town of Madison for the construction of twenty-four multiple-family garden apartment units on a parcel of land located at 100 Bradley Road in Madison. On April 1, 1971, the commission denied the application for a special exception on the sole ground that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Scott v. General Iron & Welding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Riccio v. AbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Christiano v. ChristianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Kurzatkowski v. KurzatkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lashgari v. LashgariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Nauss v. PinkesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Klug v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Fenton v. Connecticut Hospital Ass'n Workers' Compensation TrustConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Haggerty v. ParniewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.