Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. State Roads Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 16, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Duffy, J.) The facts aro stated in the opinion of the Court,

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed hy the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Baltimore City for the purpose of having the State Beads Commission of Maryland restrained from interfering with the construction and use of conduits, for the accommodation of the company’s telephone wires, in one of the State highways under the control of the Commission, without payment by the company for such user, and praying that the Commission be decreed to be without authority to make any charge against the company for the use of any of the State ro-ads for its lines-, either above or below…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Goldsborough v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  4. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. Commissioners of Cambridge v. Cambridge Water Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bd. of County Commissioners of Garrett Cty. v. Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Johnson v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Kahl v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Fisher & Carozza Bros. v. MacKallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. C. & P. Telephone Co. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API