Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Fidelity Federal Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 1996No. 93-56052PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Monica Hubbard and Earle and Nieette Humphreys appeal a grant of summary judgment in their breach of contract, fraud, and Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) class action against Fidelity Federal Bank. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I
In November, 1983, Hubbard obtained a $94,000 adjustable-rate mortgage loan from Fidelity Federal Bank. The interest rate was to be adjusted semi-annually, on June 1 and December 1, based on “the most recent” monthly weighted costs of savings, borrowings and advances by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco to the 11th District members of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- King v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Marketing West, Inc. v. Sanyo Fisher (USA) Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Laborers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California v. Kaufman & Broad Of Northern California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Hubbard v. Fidelity Federal BankDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rosal v. First Federal Bank of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Garcia v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Ralls v. Bank of New York (In Re Ralls)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Arnett v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Altman v. PNC MortgageDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.