Marketing West, Inc. v. Sanyo Fisher (USA) Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
appeal from a judgment entered in defendant’s favor following the granting of defendant’s summary judgment motion on the basis that plaintiffs could not reasonably rely on defendant’s alleged representations or alleged concealed facts which were contradicted by an unambiguous “without cause” termination provision in their employment agreements with defendant. Plaintiffs contend that their evidence of defendant’s fraudulent concealment is not barred by the parol evidence rule and their contract claim is not barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse because…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. PendergrassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & LackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.