Legal Opinion

United States v. Little

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 23, 1999No. Civil Action 97-30067-MAPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PONSOR, District Judge.

On April 6, 1999 Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman recommended that the defendants’ Motion to Suppress Evidence be denied, that the plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment be allowed and that defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. After a careful, de novo review of the motions, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the defendants’ objections and the Government’s opposition to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AkhtarDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  2. United States v. Grab Bag DistributingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API