Legal Opinion

Pipe v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 1, 2002No. 88,371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Appellant James Pipe appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Dr. James J. Hamilton. The district court held that Pipe failed to establish a prima facie case of loss of chance of survival due to medical malpractice because a 5 to 10 percent chance of survival is not substantial as a matter of law. We reverse and remand.

Edwina Pipe was admitted to the hospital on May 24,1998. Dr. Hamilton was brought in as a consultant in her case. On May 29, 1998, Dr. Hamilton operated on Edwina for small bowel…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Perez v. Las Vegas Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matsuyama v. BirnbaumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Talavera Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Bieberle v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  4. NCR Corp. v. Raytheon Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API