Pipe v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
Appellant James Pipe appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Dr. James J. Hamilton. The district court held that Pipe failed to establish a prima facie case of loss of chance of survival due to medical malpractice because a 5 to 10 percent chance of survival is not substantial as a matter of law. We reverse and remand.
Edwina Pipe was admitted to the hospital on May 24,1998. Dr. Hamilton was brought in as a consultant in her case. On May 29, 1998, Dr. Hamilton operated on Edwina for small bowel…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Perez v. Las Vegas Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matsuyama v. BirnbaumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Talavera Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Bieberle v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- NCR Corp. v. Raytheon Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2026