AT&T Communications of Southwest, Inc. v. City of Little Rock
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Judith Rogers, Judge.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the Arkansas Public Service Commission correctly found that an ordinance of the City of Little Rock (the City) that required AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. (AT&T) to pay a certain fee for the privilege of using the public streets was valid. For reversal, AT&T relies on three points: (l)(a) the City lacked the authority to enact the ordinance, specifically that Ark. Code Ann. § 14-200-101 (1987) does not provide such authority and that Ark. Code Ann. § 23-17-101 (1987) bars such action by the City, and (b) the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rainwater v. HaynesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Miles v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- City of Marion v. BaioniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- City of North Little Rock v. GrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2011