Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 14, 1994No. 93-1251Published

1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Justice

Upon review, I agree with the decision of the court of appeals, AT&T Communications v. City of Little Rock, 44 Ark. App. 30, 866 S.W.2d 414 (1993), concluding the challenged levy in this case is an invalidly imposed tax, rather than a fee authorized by Ark. Code Ann. § 14-200-101(a) (1987). Section 14-200-101 (a), the statutory authority claimed by the City of Little Rock for its enactment of this levy, patently empowers the City to assess “terms and conditions” for occupancy of its streets, highways, or other public places, acting by ordinance or resolution, which are then deemed to be prima…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Marion v. BaioniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. City of North Little Rock v. GrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Holman v. City of DierksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. AT&T Communications of Southwest, Inc. v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API