Legal Opinion
In Re Baseball Bat Antitrust Litigation (MDL No. 1249)
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 28, 1999No. 6:98-cv-01249PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Following a transfer order of the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the Court has jurisdiction over consolidated pretrial proceedings in these actions. This matter comes before the Court on Motion For Reconsideration And To Amend The Complaint (Doc. # 53) which the Baum plaintiffs filed December 4, 1998 in Baum Research & Dev. Co. v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Inc., Case No. Civ.A. 99-2112-KHV.
Pursuant to E.D.Mieh. Local Rule 7.1(g)(3), plaintiffs seek reconsideration of the order of the United States District Court for…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Sports Rehab Consulting LLC v. Vail Clinic Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025