Legal Opinion
Wagner & Wagner Auto Sales, Inc. v. Tarro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 31, 2006No. AC 26281PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
In this summary process action, a landlord has sued to recover immediate possession of a piece of commercial real estate because of the tenants’ failure to pay rent. On appeal from the judgment in favor of the landlord, the tenants have raised two issues. They argue that the trial court improperly decided that (1) the landlord, an unregistered foreign corporation, was entitled to pursue its lawsuit in this state because it was not “transacting business” within the meaning of General Statutes § 33-920 (a), and (2) the tenants failed to prove that the premises were untenantable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Monetary Funding Group, Inc. v. PluchinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Sawyer Savings Bank v. American Trading Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Evans v. WeissbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Heritage Square, LLC v. EoanouConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sullivan v. DelisaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Hunting v. ChambersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Wright v. MallettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- WAGNER AND WAGNER AUTO SALES, INC. v. TarroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Wagner & Wagner Auto Sales, Inc. v. TarroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.