Legal Opinion
United States v. Gene E. Meuli
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1993No. 93-3073PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Gene E. Meuli was convicted of eight counts of making a false statement, 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and one count of filing a false income tax return, 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). Defendant appeals his convictions on all counts, and the district court’s imposition of a $1,000.00 fine, U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742.
Defendant obtained a series of loans from the Federal Land Bank, Kansas, 1 and the Farmers Home Administration, a federal agency. These loans were secured by mortgages on Defendant’s farm property in Kansas. Upon…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. YermianSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valerio Ernest Miranda v. Thomas Cooper, Superintendent, and Frank Gunter, (Gunther) Sic, Director, D.O.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Anthony Ray Jefferson and Roosevelt Jefferson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. John Wesley Morehead, Sr., John Wesley Morehead, Jr., and Jackie Ray HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. ArcadipaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Gregory W. Frazier, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Herta Wittgenstein, Also Known as Herta Hilscher, Also Known as Herta ChristiensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.