Legal Opinion
Red River Commodities, Inc. v. Eidsness
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1990No. Civ. 890323PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
Red River Commodities, Inc. (RRC) sued George Eidsness for breach of his contracts to grow and to deliver sunflowers. The trial court awarded RRC judgment for $33,760.50. George appealed. We affirm.
While wintering in Arizona in early 1988, North Dakota farmer George Eidsness agreed by telephone to grow and to sell 350,000 pounds of confection sunflowers to RRC at a floor price of 11.25 cents per pound. In George’s absence, one of his sons signed “Confection Sunflower Production” contracts for George. Contract No. 217, signed on February 15, 1988, was for 200,000 pounds, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Allenberg Cotton Co. v. PittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Bank of Harvey v. International Harvester Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Askew v. Joachim Memorial HomeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Glatt v. Bank of Kirkwood PlazaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Red River Commodities, Inc. v. EidsnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Cavendish Farms, Inc. v. Mathiason Farms, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Weeks v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Benz Farm, LLP v. Cavendish Farms, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Red River Commodities, Inc. v. EidsnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.