Legal Opinion

Red River Commodities, Inc. v. Eidsness

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1990No. Civ. 890323Published

1Opinion of the Court

459 N.W.2d 811 (1990)

RED RIVER COMMODITIES, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

George EIDSNESS, Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. No. 890323.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

August 1, 1990.

Yuill, Wold, Johnson & Feder, Fargo, for plaintiff and appellee; argued by Robert A. Feder.

Wheeler Wolf, Bismarck, for defendant and appellant; argued by Arnold V. Fleck.

MESCHKE, Justice.

Red River Commodities, Inc. (RRC) sued George Eidsness for breach of his contracts to grow and to deliver sunflowers. The trial court awarded RRC judgment for $33,760.50. George appealed. We affirm.

While wintering in Arizona in early…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Allenberg Cotton Co. v. PittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. National Bank of Harvey v. International Harvester Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tallackson Potato Co., Inc. v. MTK Potato Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Askew v. Joachim Memorial HomeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API