Legal Opinion
In Re Bolongaro
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 6, 1933No. Patent Appeal 3062PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
The appellant claims to have invented certain new and useful improvements and methods of producing printed publications from manuscripts. His method is rather fully set out in his rejected claims 8 and 9; claim 8 being here given as typical of both:
“8. Method of producing a printed publication from manuscripts, which comprises counting the letter spaces of a multiplicity of full lines contained on a plurality of pages of the printed publication, dividing the sum of said letter spaces by the number of lines counted to establish an arbitrary space fad or per line, then…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hotel Security Checking Co. v. Lorraine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- United States Credit System Co. v. American Credit Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
- Guthrie v. CurlettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Hocke v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Berry v. Wynkoop-Hallenbeck-Crawford Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Shao Wen YuanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In Re AbramsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981