Legal Opinion

Fate v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1938No. 3647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTHALL, Justice.

Mrs. M. L. Holland, a feme sole, brought this suit in the district court of Brewster county, Tex., against E. W. Fate and others to recover upon the following promissory note, and interest thereon, less the credits admitted, and to foreclose the liens expressed in said note, and in the agreement expressed in writing and attached to and made a part of the petition. The note reads as follows:

“1392.50 No. 1, Alpine, Texas, May 17, A. D. 1929.
“For value received, I, we or either of 'us, the undersigned, promise to pay to G. H. Storey the sum of one thousand and three hundred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Farmers' Life Ins. Co. v. WoltersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Martin v. Somervell CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Power v. WesthoffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Clayton v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Healy v. MastersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API