Legal Opinion

Martin v. Somervell County

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Somervell. Tried below before Hon. J. S. Straughan.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by defendant in error in the District Court o'f Somervell County on the 31st day of March, 1897, upon a certain note for $500, with its interest, and to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate. The note sued -on was executed on the 3d day of March, 1884, payable five years after date, with interest at the rate of 10 per cent per annum, payable annually. The defendant, among other things, pleaded the four years statute of limitation.

Briefly stated, the evidence, among other things, tended to show that on December 2, 1892, J. J. Matthews, then…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. NalleTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Howard Hume, Administrators, Etc. v. WindomTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. City of Dallas v. PeacockTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kelly v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Jackson v. PoolTennessee Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Jackson v. McFaddenMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gray v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Power v. WesthoffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Wendover v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Shackelford v. NeilonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API