Weintraub v. Law Office of Patenaude & Felix
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES [DOC. 41]
THOMAS J. WHELAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Bridget Weintraub’s motion to strike Defendants Law Office of Patenaude & Felix, A.P.C. and National Collegiate Trust (“NCT”)’s affirmative defenses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). Specifically, Plaintiff requests that the Court strike the First through Thirteenth affirmative defenses from Defendants’ answer. Defendants oppose.
The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d.l). For the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Balon v. Enhanced Recovery Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Cejas v. ParamoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Cota v. Aveda CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Hybrid International, LLC v. Scotia International of NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020