Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Dugan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1951No. 1085PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

Plaintiff bought from defendant a hearing aid and several months later, claiming that it did not accomplish the purpose for which it was purchased, rescinded the sale- and sued to recover the purchase price. The trial judge, sitting without a jury,, awarded her judgment and defendant prosecutes this appeal.

Plaintiff, who has had trouble with her hearing since she was a small child but had never used a hearing aid before, informed defendant, a dealer in hearing aids, with nearly twenty years experience in such work, that she needed a hearing aid', for groups and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Ross v. Northrup, King & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Barrett Co. v. Panther Rubber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green v. Northeast Motor CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Hagedorn v. LeroyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Hagedorn v. TaggartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Tucker v. Michael Bonsby Heating and Air Conditioning LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API