Legal Opinion

Parker v. Merck & Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 27, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00916Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RICHARD PARKER, an individual Case No.: 3:24-cv-00916-H-BLM 13 Plaintiff, ORDER: 14 v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 15 MERCK & CO., INC., a New Jersey MOTION FOR SUMMARY Corporation; MERCK SHARP & 16 JUDGMENT; DOHME CORP., a New Jersey 17 Corporation; ORGANON & CO., a (2) DENYING AS MOOT Delaware Corporation; ORGANON LLC, 18 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO a Delaware Limited Liability Company; EXCLUDE OR LIMIT 19 and DOES 1-10, inclusive, OPINION TESTIMONY OF 20 Defendants. DAVID HEALY; AND 21 (3) DENYING AS MOOT 22…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API